[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about `cond*'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Question about `cond*' |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Oct 2024 09:27:47 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: philipk@posteo.net, michelangelo.rodriguez@gmail.com,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 23:18:55 -0400
>
> > I think we should first consider autoloading cond*, before we
> > talk about preloading it.
>
> You're right, autoloading it would be good enough. How about it?
I have no objections to that.
- Re: Question about `cond*', (continued)
- Re: Question about `cond*', Michelangelo Rodriguez, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Philip Kaludercic, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Richard Stallman, 2024/10/02
- Re: Question about `cond*', Sean Whitton, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Sean Whitton, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/03
- Re: Question about `cond*', Andrea Corallo, 2024/10/04
- Re: Question about `cond*', Richard Stallman, 2024/10/05
- Re: Question about `cond*', Sean Whitton, 2024/10/06
- Re: Question about `cond*',
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Question about `cond*', Stefan Kangas, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/01
- Re: Question about `cond*', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/10/02