Re: Question about loading libraries

[Michelangelo Rodriguez]

Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>>> There is a way to load source files by default instead of
>>> compiled at startup? The problem i have is that i have an
>>> error during the initialization, but the backtrace shows
>>> compiled functions that at the moment are meaningless for
>>> me when i try to fix the error.
>>
>> Specify the .el extension explicitly.  Like this:
>>
>>   (load "foo.el")
>
> Yes, but there is no way to do this _in general_, to say now
> I prefer uncompiled, not byte-compiled and not
> natively compiled?
Yes, that was my question: i know about specifying ".el" as the name of
a library, but the problem for me is that in this case i don't know
which library is responsible for the error, and i think it should be
useful to have an option to specify that we want all libraries loaded as
interpreted code.

Best regards,
Michelangelo Rodriguez