Hello!
Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:
Small suggestion: When possible, using BUFFER-LOCAL-VALUE is
preferable over WITH-CURRENT-BUFFER, as it's significantly faster (in
my testing). You could do this in `eww--list-buffers-get-data'.
Also, you might want to disable the undo list in the list buffer to
save memory, since there's no need to undo in that buffer.
Finally, in `eww-buffer-list', you could use `match-buffers' instead
of a bespoke loop.
Thanks for working on this.
--Adam
First, thank you, as I wasn't aware of buffer-local-value nor
match-buffers!
These sound a bit like micro-optimizations, how many eww buffers can one
person have open that these speed differences would matter?