[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Physical keyboard events
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: Physical keyboard events |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:28:20 +0700 |
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 10:22, Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not *for key with modifiers*, but during lookup in keymaps. There are
> enough keybindings that include keys without modifiers.
I’m going to posit the hypothesis that the *only* command for which it
makes sense to use the keysym of the current layout is
‘self-insert-command’.
Everything else wants the keysym of “the” Latin-based layout if there
is one and only one; the keycode if there is none; and some heuristic
tiebreaker for the case where the user has more than one Latin-based
layout configured.
- Physical keyboard events, Cecilio Pardo, 2024/10/28
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/29
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Cecilio Pardo, 2024/10/29
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/29
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Yuri Khan, 2024/10/29
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/29
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Max Nikulin, 2024/10/29
- Re: Physical keyboard events,
Yuri Khan <=
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Peter Feigl, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Yuri Khan, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Dov Grobgeld, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Juri Linkov, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Yuri Khan, 2024/10/31
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/30
- Re: Physical keyboard events, Max Nikulin, 2024/10/30