[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
master ed0b589480: (byte-compile-eval): Avoid some false positive "norun
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
master ed0b589480: (byte-compile-eval): Avoid some false positive "noruntime" warnings |
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2022 17:20:42 -0400 (EDT) |
branch: master
commit ed0b589480a1e0a20364e1349fa8fa957ecb1efc
Author: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Commit: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
(byte-compile-eval): Avoid some false positive "noruntime" warnings
* lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-eval): Loosen the check
before refraining from adding a function to noruntime.
---
lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
index cbf2659109..1fef9b00d8 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
@@ -1056,8 +1056,14 @@ Each function's symbol gets added to
`byte-compile-noruntime-functions'."
(dolist (s xs)
(pcase s
(`(defun . ,f)
- (unless (seq-some #'autoloadp
- (get (cdr s) 'function-history))
+ ;; If `f' has a history, it's presumably because
+ ;; it was already defined beforehand (typically
+ ;; as an autoload). It could also be because it
+ ;; was defined twice during `form', in which case
+ ;; we arguably should add it to b-c-noruntime-functions,
+ ;; but it's not clear it's worth the trouble
+ ;; trying to recognize that case.
+ (unless (get f 'function-history)
(push f byte-compile-noruntime-functions)))))))))))))
(defun byte-compile-eval-before-compile (form)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- master ed0b589480: (byte-compile-eval): Avoid some false positive "noruntime" warnings,
Stefan Monnier <=