[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09
From: |
Bernt Hansen |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:23:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Nuutti Kotivuori <address@hidden> writes:
> Bastien wrote:
>> The only thing that still tickles me here is that the *default* priority
>> is not the *easiest* to assign. So why not this:
>
> I've never understood what's the difference between a line with the
> default priority and a line without a priority at all. That is, with
> the default settings:
>
> * [#B] Foo
> * Bar
>
> Are these not equivalent in priority sorting? If so, why should the
> default priority be ever explicitly said?
I never use [#B] priority. I only set A and C. I'm in the habit of
globally replacing [#B] with nothing since I think the task item looks
much cleaner without it (since it shows up in timelog reports and on the
agenda).
Bernt
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, (continued)
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Rainer Stengele, 2007/09/15
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Levin, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Bastien, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Bastien, 2007/09/20
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Nuutti Kotivuori, 2007/09/20
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09,
Bernt Hansen <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, John Wiegley, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Bastien, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Rick Moynihan, 2007/09/24
Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Levin, 2007/09/18
Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Levin, 2007/09/18