|
From: | Carsten Dominik |
Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] FR: toggling timestamps active/inactive |
Date: | Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:44:25 +0200 |
On Oct 16, 2007, at 18:22, Adam Spiers wrote:
Rick Moynihan (address@hidden) wrote:Adam Spiers wrote:Hi Carsten, Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and <>. Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently told my presence at the event is no longer necessary. Consequently I would like to keep it in the file for reference, to track colleagues' movements or in case my presence is re-required, but I don't want the event to appear in the agenda. By the way, I probably could have coded this in the time it took towrite the mail, but I thought that until I've sent a piece of paper tothe FSF assigning rights for code contributed to org-mode and emacs,it would be better to let Carsten write it. Is that correct or flawedthinking?This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today (if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators. e.g. - foo - bar - baz |<-- Point
This cammand does exist, it is `C-c -'.
Calling the toggle-list-indicator function at the point will cause the list indicator to change from a - to a + (and vice versa).Nice idea! Or even between - and *** at the current level. Maybe that should cycle. Or maybe there are already existing keybindings which distinguish between new - and *** entries? M-RET doesn't always DWIM, personally.
When you are in a list, M-RET makes the next list item, C-u M-RET makesthe next section, and C-RET does the same - even if for different reasons.
In what sense does M-RET not DWYM? - Carsten
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |