[Orgmode] automatically jumping to stored note location

[Adam Spiers]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:48:01PM +0000, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:01:37AM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > >On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:28:42AM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > >>   - The new command `org-remember-goto-last-stored' will jump
> > >>     to the location of the remember note stored most recently.
> > >>     If you have `org-remember' on a key like `C-c r', then you
> > >>     can go to the location with a double prefix arg: `C-u C-u
> > >>     C-c r'.  This was a proposal by Rainer Stengele.
> > >
> > >This is also great - it would be *even* better if we also had the
> > >per-template option of automatically jumping there.
> > 
> > We do, this is from the 5.14 release notes:
> > 
> >    You can now use a C-u prefix on `org-remember' to jump to the
> >    location where a specific templates stores its notes. For
> >    example, if you have `org-remember' bound to `C-c r', then `C-u
> >    C-c r n' will get you to the file and headline given in the
> >    template associated with the letter "n".
> 
> Sorry, I should have been clearer.  I'm aware of that functionality,
> but for some templates, I really want it to *automatically* jump to
> where the note has been stored *immediately* after storing has
> happened, rather than requiring extra keystrokes.  This is because for
> some templates, I will *always* want to review the new note in its
> final context.  That's why I suggested implementing it by reusing the
> really nice idea you had of defining %! within a template to mean
> "don't prompt me" - similarly you could have %& or some other sequence
> to mean "jump straight to the destination".  And in some cases, a
> combination of both ("%!%&") will be very effective.
> 
> Additionally it would provide a workaround to the problems described
> here:
> 
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/4692
> 
> since if the new item is immediately moved to its final context,
> keywords/tags/priorities etc. can be set there rather than from within
> the *Remember* buffer.

Any more thoughts on this one?  I would have thought it would be very
easy to implement, and it would be a huge help in streamlining my
workflow (and hopefully other people's too).

Additionally, is it possible to set up a template so that it will
always insert at the very top of a particular file?

Thanks!