[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Fix Subtle Heading Creation Bugs
From: |
Manish |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Fix Subtle Heading Creation Bugs |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:29:24 +0530 |
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>> I am not so sure about forcing headline creation even when in a plain
>> list item. I can see why you would want it like this. However, the
>> reason for the current behavior is that then you can use the respect-
>> content function as a full replacement for M-RET, without the need to
>> always switch back and force between the two commands.
>>
>> Any thought about this?
>
> My position is that I want both features, and I have two key bindings,
> so it's a perfect match.
>
> The way I work is that I use C-RET for creating headings, and M-RET for
> creating plain lists. I never use M-RET for creating headings because I
> don't like how it creates the heading above the body of the current
> item.
>
> I could set org-insert-heading-respect-content to t, but it makes more
> sense in my head that M-RET is for plain lists, and C-RET is for
> headings.
>
> Before my patch, C-RET and M-RET only differed in where the heading was
> created (before or after the body). But the original behavior of
> OrgMode was that M-RET in a plain list created a new plain list item,
> while C-RET in a plain list would create a new heading.
>
> However, this could all be chalked up to me being lazy. I could just as
> easily do this in a plain list instead: RET C-RET. Well, except that
> with my patch, C-RET will create a new heading, even if point is in a
> drawer or something like a clock line. In that case I could do C-u
> C-RET.
>
> I just like the path of least resistance for creating new headings,
> C-RET. If this isn't good for OrgMode in general, I can easily bind C-j
> to do what I want as well.
I liked Peter's description, tried his patch and find C-Ret and M-Ret
behaviour better now. Earlier C-Ret and M-Ret had same effects (in my
setup) but makes better sense (to me) after the patch. Just a humble
opinion.
--
Manish