[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees
From: |
Jota Pin |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: [Bulk] Re: clocksum and archived trees |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:59:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
> Jota Pin <address@hidden> writes:
> > I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to contribute
> > to the sum of times showed with "Display Times" c-c c-x c-d.
>
> I've been wondering something along the same lines myself. When
> switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
> time because of archive items.
>
> I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet. Maybe I'll try to fix
> this tomorrow when I get some time.
Thanks, this would be great.
Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do want to
keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes archives tags
to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must no count
twice there...
Same question for clock tables.