emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Re: LaTeX export bugs?


From: Sébastien Vauban
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: LaTeX export bugs?
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:40:51 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux)

Hi Carsten,

Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>> Other things I've noticed:
>>
>> - Even with version 6.28, the `#+TBLNAME' tag must be located in column 0
>> (at least, for the highlighting features to work)
>
> Fixed, thanks.

Euh, no, *I* am supposed to answer: "Fixed, thanks", and I'm doing it... ;-)


>> - Remote references to other tables are great, but they only work with
>>  absolute references, not with named cells.
>
> They actually do work fine.  A call like remote(mytbl,$name) will work
> in this table
>
> | _ | name |
> |   | value |

OK. I did not understand from the doc (section 3.5.1) that I had to prefix the
name of the cell with $:

   "REF is an absolute field [...] as described above."

I admit that, knowing it, I understand the above text better. Maybe is such
an example missing?

Now, more important question, one of the few that's not answered from my
previous post: how can I shade or frame a table? For me, inserting #+LaTeX
tags is different from inserting #+BEGIN_LaTeX and #+END_LaTeX tags: the first
one should have no impact on the rest of the text.

Though, it isn't as you can see with my following example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#+LaTeX: \begin{framed}
#+ATTR_LaTeX: align=lrrr
| Code      | \euro{} |  \% | \euro{} |
|-----------+---------+-----+---------|
| GSM       |         |     |    0.00 |
| Internet  |  168.45 | 100 |  168.45 |
| Matériel  |  295.99 | 100 |  295.99 |
| Publicité |  214.25 |  33 |   70.70 |
| Autres    |         |     |    0.00 |
|-----------+---------+-----+---------|
| Total     |         |     |  535.14 |
#+TBLFM: $4=$2*$3/100;%.2f::@7$4=vsum(@address@hidden)
#+LaTeX: \end{framed}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Am I misunderstanding section 12.7.2 or is this a feature?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]