[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:53:06 +0200 |
Hi Karsten,
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Karsten Heymann wrote:
Hi Carsten,
a small note:
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
If you have customized the variable org-export-latex-classes, you
need
to remove the following lines from each class definition:
\usepackage[AUTO]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{soul}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{hyperref}
Do you have any recommendations for the sequence in which these
packages should be called? Or does that make no difference at all?
Does any of these cause problems if they are called twice (say I
add them, but users have them configured already?)
The following packages should also be safe to add, as they are part of
the standard latex distribution:
textcomp (better Text symbols, for example list bullets not made of
math
chars, are used automatically if package is loaded)
fixltx2e (numerous small slightly backwards incompatible changes, see
http://ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/fixltx2e.html)
Also, I'd recommend \usepackage{microtype} and a gentle increase of
the
\tolerance value (less perfectionist text justification) for a much
nicer out-of-the-box experience:
What is is really changing due to these last two
settings (microtype) and tolerance, could you explain in a bit more
detail?
And: Can I expect fixltx2e to be present in all distributions?
Is \tolerance defined in microtype, or did you put these together just
incidentally?
\usepackage{microtype}
\tolerance=1000
Yours
Karsten
I really appreciate expert advice about this. Thank you.
- Carsten
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Mark Elston, 2010/04/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Nick Dokos, 2010/04/04
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/04
Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Robert Klein, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/04/06
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Karsten Heymann, 2010/04/07
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/04/07