Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?

[Dan Davison]

Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes:

> Another way to look at it is that this is an annotation mechanism.  It
> can be used for any type of file or buffer.  This would include text,
> websites (i.e. pointing to and annotating documents on the web),
> dired, source code, org files, html source, etc.
>
> Modifying existing link syntax will be difficult, especially because
> there might be additional features we need a year or two from now.
> For maximum flexibility and simplicity, this might be a good first use
> of extensible syntax.

Hi Samuel,

I'm not quite clear what you're referring to when you say "this" in the
above sentences. Also, when you say "extensible syntax", are you
referring to the existing link syntax, or to a proposed extension?

Thanks,

Dan

>
> Samuel