|
From: | Stephan Schmitt |
Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] Re: Poll: Who is using these commands |
Date: | Sun, 09 May 2010 16:42:40 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 05/09/2010 04:26 PM, Also sprach Leo:
On 2010-05-09 12:43 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative bindings? These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here have pointed out, they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, press the character.)It is terrible idea to override these parenthesis movement bindings. They are universal in all editing modes that if overridden people who also use other emacs packages will be surprised. For example to move from a open parenthesis to a closing parenthesis.
On the other hand, I often press the C-M-[fbnp] combinations in org mode with the expectation to navigate through the logical structure like I'm used from lisp mode. Then I'm surprised to find the point somewhere in a hidden subtree with the cursor at the ellipsis which represent it. In other words, in a more abstract view as structure navigating keys the proposed binding is more intuive then the parenthesis oriented motion. But perhaps this holds only for lisp hackers... Greetings, Stephan
However, it makes sense to bind C-M-a and C-M-e to move the the beginning/end of a subtree. I don't use these org movement bindings much because isearch does the job perfectly and it can be used everywhere. Leo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |