[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:27:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/23.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
Hello,
>>>>> Sébastien Vauban writes:
> Though, I don't understand cases where we would like to preserve the
> "verbatimness" of the linebreaks, but not of the lists, which is the
> case, currently, for VERSE. Is there any useful use case for that?
> For me, both should be supported together, whichever the
> environment, or none.
I'm not sure to understand what you have in mind here.
On a technical point, I fail to see how you can have both leading
white spaces preserved and lists interpreted, in a reasonable way.
Thus, as VERSE environment preserves those spaces, lists can only be
left uninterpreted there.
Perhaps what you are missing is a block where only line breaks are
verbatim. There's an export option to preserve them on the whole file
but not on a part of a document, AFAIK.
> For the emails, what environment would you advice me to use in
> general? The patched VERSE, or back to EXAMPLE (distinguished from
> RESULT, since Eric's patch to wrap the Org results)?
I think VERSE (patched) is better than EXAMPLE because you can still
benefit from text markup (and LaTeX snippets). Sadly, mails can
sometimes be, well, very distant from poetry...
Regards,
-- Nicolas
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, (continued)
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Dan Davison, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Dan Davison, 2010/11/21
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Nicolas Goaziou, 2010/11/21
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/23
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Nicolas Goaziou, 2010/11/24