[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Closing #+results: with #+end declaration?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
[O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Closing #+results: with #+end declaration? |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:11:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Eric,
"Eric Schulte" <address@hidden> writes:
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results wrap :exports both
> (mapcar (lambda (el) (list el (+ 1 (* el el)))) (number-sequence 0 10))
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> #+BEGIN_RESULT
> | 0 | 1 |
> | 1 | 2 |
> | 2 | 5 |
> | 3 | 10 |
> | 4 | 17 |
> | 5 | 26 |
> | 6 | 37 |
> | 7 | 50 |
> | 8 | 65 |
> | 9 | 82 |
> | 10 | 101 |
> #+END_RESULT
>
> I've just added documentation of the "wrap" header argument to the
> manual.
Thanks -- IMHO wrapping with begin/end_result could be the default,
or even the only option avaiable (but it would break current code.)
> I agree that (possibly aside from clarity) there is no real need for the
> end block to specify its type. However as I use helper methods
> (e.g. yasnippets) for all block creation, then extra characters
> represent no real typing burden.
Let's think about this later, no real emergency here.
Thanks for your feedback,
--
Bastien
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Closing #+results: with #+end declaration?,
Bastien <=