emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] org-collector calculated rows?


From: Rehan Iftikhar
Subject: Re: [O] org-collector calculated rows?
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:14:43 -0800

I updated to 7.5, recompiled, and now it works!

Thanks for the help!


On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
> Rehan Iftikhar <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I have tried adding
>>
>>  #+TBLFM: @>$>=vmean(I..II)
>>
>> between the #+BEGIN and #+END lines (after generating a table), but
>> when I C-c C-c on #+BEGIN, the table refreshes and removes the #+TBLFM
>> line.
>>
>> I am using org-mode 7.4. Any idea why my formula isn't working?
>>
>
> I don't know why the #+TBLFM line disappears: it does not in my case -
> assuming that I've got org-collector loaded: since it's a contrib
> package it's not loaded automatically for me and when I tried the
> refresh before loading org-collector, *everything* disappeared: the
> table and the formula. But once I got the package loaded correctly,
> things worked as I described before: if only the formula is in there, it
> gets wiped out, but if there is a table along with the formula, the
> table gets refreshed and the formula is recalculated.
>
> BTW, the formula is wrong: it should read
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+TBLFM: @>$>=vmean(@I..II)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> and that also assumes that you are running a very recent version of org,
> one that recognizes @> and $>. But neither of these would explain why
> the formula is wiped.
>
> Nick
>
> PS. I'm using Eric Schulte's standard example from the Worg site:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * Example
>
> #+BEGIN: propview :id "december" :conds ((string= spendtype "food")) :cols 
> (ITEM amount)
> | "ITEM"                           | "amount" |
> |----------------------------------+----------|
> | "Grocery Store [2008-12-01 Mon]" |    56.77 |
> | "Restaurant [2008-12-08 Mon]"    |    30.67 |
> | "Grocery Store [2008-12-09 Tue]" |    56.76 |
> |----------------------------------+----------|
> |                                  |          |
> #+TBLFM: @>$>=vmean(@I..II)
> #+END:
>
>
>
> #+BEGIN: propview :cols (ITEM (+ 400 amount)) :scope tree :match "example"
> | "ITEM"                           | "(+ 400 amount)" |
> |----------------------------------+------------------|
> | "December Spending"              |                0 |
> | "Week One"                       |                0 |
> | "Grocery Store [2008-12-01 Mon]" |           456.77 |
> | "Athletic club [2008-12-02 Tue]" |            475.0 |
> | "Week Two "                      |                0 |
> | "Restaurant [2008-12-08 Mon]"    |           430.67 |
> | "Grocery Store [2008-12-09 Tue]" |           456.76 |
> |----------------------------------+------------------|
> |                                  |        259.88571 |
> #+TBLFM: @>$>=vmean(@I..II)
> #+END:
> #+TBLFM: @>$> = vmean(@I..II)
> ** December Spending                                                   
> :example:
>   :PROPERTIES:
>   :ID:       december
>   :END:
>
> *** Week One
> **** Grocery Store [2008-12-01 Mon]
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :amount: 56.77
>     :spendtype: food
>     :END:
> **** Athletic club [2008-12-02 Tue]
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :amount: 75.00
>     :spendtype: health
>     :END:
> *** Week Two
> **** Restaurant [2008-12-08 Mon]
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :amount: 30.67
>     :spendtype: food
>     :END:
> **** Grocery Store [2008-12-09 Tue]
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :amount: 56.76
>     :spendtype: food
>     :END:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> Rehan Iftikhar <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >   * More Complex Example: displaying the mean of the "Amount" column
>> >> > for each week.
>> >> >
>> >
>> > I see that I misread this: the formula calculates the mean of all the 
>> > entries,
>> > not the mean for each week. Having thought about it for about 10 seconds,
>> > I cannot think of a way to do that.
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Rehan
>>
>



-- 
-Rehan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]