[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Grouping clock report by tag?
From: |
John Hendy |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Grouping clock report by tag? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:06:00 -0600 |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Giovanni Ridolfi
<address@hidden> wrote:
> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Sorry -- forgot the list...
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:06 PM, John Hendy <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>> > How about a clock table with a :tag: column and an option to sort by
>>>> > common tag?
>
> The idea has been already suggested, with patches, but I think the patches
> got lost during the FSF copyright assignment
>
Somehow I missed this email!
> 1. by Adam Elliott, see:
>
> On Feb 23, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Adam Elliott wrote:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/22526
>
That looks like the behavior as-is (i.e. a :tags "tagname" option)
Oh, and perhaps the :tags option should be better documented in the
manual. I tried in vain to combine tags and only just now saw the
thread that looks like it inspired the :tags option. The mailing list
posts contains the syntax ("tag1-tag2", "tag1+tag2") but since there
is no example clocktable using the :tags option in the manual:
1) it took me a while even to figure out to put the word in quotations
2) I had no idea whatsoever if multiple tags were possible
> 2. And also by B Grobauer, with a huge patch
> Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:24:44 +0200
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-06/msg00536.html
>
Now *this* looks like just what I was loooking for. Yes -- an option
to group by tag or even simply include a column which lists the tags.
I can do several tables, but for me this is more just to show where I
spend my time, not for billing... so it would be great to analyze the
ratios between my various "buckets" (for which I use tags to
identify).
> If Bastien is going to implement this feature, I ask again[1]:
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Is it possible to check also for properies
> and not only for tag?
>
> we can add a special PROPERTY: CLOCKTAG
>
> Rationale:
> In my setup I have a remember template where I write the task I'm doing.
> with some information e.g.:
>
> ** reading bibliography
> CLOCK: [2010-06-21 lun 09:24]
> :PROPERTIES:
> :ID: lab
> :Type:expected
> :People: Giovanni
> :Location: computer
> :Connection: nil
> :CLOCKTAG:PV Project
> :Comment:
> :END:
>
> If the function checks also the :PROPERTIES: drawer and the existence of
> the special PROPERTY: CLOCKTAG I can keep my setup and exploit this
> marvellous new feature.
>
> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-06/msg00554.html
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Another method could be to use the clock report from agenda R
> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:29:25 -0400
> (Sebastien Vauban)
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-10/msg01494.html
>
>
> cheers,
> Giovanni
>