Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch)

[Nick Dokos]

Marcel van der Boom <address@hidden> wrote:

> This patch is what is attached to the message displayed at [1]. I have
> been using this patch for a while and it works fine. From searching it
> looks like this patch was 'forgotten', but I may have overlooked
> something.
> 
> If the patch was rejected, you can ignore me. If it was forgotten I'd
> like to request to include it.
> 

I don't think it was rejected outright, it looks as if it was
inadvertently dropped. Probably part of the reason is that David sent
the patches as application/octet-stream so they never made it to
patchwork (was patchwork even running back in 2009? I don't remember
when it was set up.) The other part might be that it's a contrib package
so most people never get to use it, let alone complain about it. The third
part might be that it was Dec. 31, so people were out partying instead of
applying patches (unimaginable, I know :-) )

The patch is now in patchwork (under your name), so it will be addressed
at some point. One question: there was a second patch in the link you
provided - should that be resubmitted as well?

Nick

> 
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg20882.html 
> 
>