[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Re: Outlook replacement
From: |
Suvayu Ali |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Re: Outlook replacement |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:27:34 -0700 |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:18:33 +0100
Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> wrote:
> Steinar Bang <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >>>>>> Suvayu Ali <address@hidden>:
> >
> >> How do you (as in all users using Emacs as their email client) deal
> >> with unreliable networks? When I used to use tramp over a
> >> particularly slow/unreliable network day before, I found every
> >> time tramp got stuck emacs would hang too until tramp could
> >> recover.
> >
> > What does tramp have to do with using emacs as an email client?
>
> I think the point was that tramp on an unreliable network illustrates
> the problems with emacs's single-threaded implementation and not that
> it is otherwise related to email in emacs.
Yes, that was my point of mentioning tramp. I think the conclusion we
arrived at was to use OfflineImap would be the most optimum solution
for my use case.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.