emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[O] org-beamer: getting back to no indentation after a block


From: bozongo
Subject: [O] org-beamer: getting back to no indentation after a block
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:19:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9

I've just given a presentation using org-beamer and it worked really well. Thanks, guys!

During preparation I ran into the problem described in the toy presentation below. I'm aware of why the second slide looks how it looks (the last line "belongs" to the block header). Still, I wonder if there's a simpler solution for telling org that I want to get back to no indentation after the block, similar to the way on the very first slide.

I realise that using the solition on the last slide is not a big deal, so I'm fine if that's the answer.

        michael


#+STARTUP: beamer
#+LaTeX_CLASS: beamer
#+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [presentation]
#+BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA: \usetheme{Warsaw}\usefonttheme[onlysmall]{structurebold}
#+BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL: 2
* My question in three slides
** A slide
Some unindented text
- item
- another item
back to unindented text
** The same slide, but with a block
Some unindented text
*** the only way to get a block is to add a heading, right?         :B_block:
    :PROPERTIES:
    :BEAMER_env: block
    :END:
    - item
    - another item
back to unindented text -- but no, this doesn't work, I'm still in
the block
** The same slide, but with a block
Some unindented text
*** the only way to get a block is to add a heading, right?         :B_block:
    :PROPERTIES:
    :BEAMER_env: block
    :END:
    - item
    - another item
*** This is the only way I can get what I want                     :B_normal:
    :PROPERTIES:
    :BEAMER_env: normal
    :END:
but the fact that I'm forced to use a *** heading in the org file although
I specifically don't want any bullets makes me wonder if there isn't a
simpler way to achieve what I want?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]