[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] emdash and endash
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: [O] emdash and endash |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:39:24 -0700 |
On 2011-04-17, Ben Finney <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think not. I see many (non-Org) ASCII documents that distinguish a
> notional em dash from en dash by different number of hyphens, as in your
> first list.
Like this---really? Or --- this? It does look, however, as if people
use different standards. I am not suggesting that the default be
changed.
> “Consistent with ASCII”? ASCII has neither en dash nor em dash, so it's
> not ASCII that you're wanting to be consistent with. You're referring to
> conventions that attempt to preserve Unicode characters in ASCII.
Quite right. Of course, some conventions -- this one included
(or--arguably uglier but many favor it--this one) -- began before
Unicode.