[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?
From: |
Ken.Williams |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Spurious source-code output? |
Date: |
Thu, 5 May 2011 10:40:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 |
On 5/5/11 10:37 AM, "Nick Dokos" <address@hidden> wrote:
><address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got the following source-code section in a sample org-mode
>>document:
>>
>> #+BEGIN_SRC R :exports output :results graphics :file t.png
>> plot(1:10, 1:10)
>> #+END_SRC
>>
>>
>Try ``:exports results'' - the Org manual says:
>[...]
Ack, I even looked at that very section of the manual just moments before
I posted. Thanks for the help.
--
Ken Williams
Senior Research Scientist
Thomson Reuters
http://labs.thomsonreuters.com
- [O] Spurious source-code output?, Ken.Williams, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?,
Ken.Williams <=
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Eric Schulte, 2011/05/05
- Re: [O] [Patch] Documentation, was Re: Spurious source-code output?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/05