emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Ctl-E doesn't go to end of line?


From: Bernt Hansen
Subject: Re: [O] Ctl-E doesn't go to end of line?
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 23:45:20 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)

Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:

> Bernt Hansen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> "Mark S." <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi Bernt,
>> >
>> > Thanks for pointing that out.
>> >
>> > However, I'm not on an item line nor a header line, so those settings
>> > should not apply. But even when I changed my line to an item, and then
>> > tried the settings "t" and "reversed", it still wouldn't hop to the
>> > end of the line in one go. In fact, if the line is long enough, I may
>> > have to hit Ctl-E several times. So is something broken, or is there
>> > some other incantation?
>> >
>> 
>> Sorry Mark, I just tried it on a headline only.  C-e invokes
>> end-of-visual-line and there seems to be no way to turn that off as a
>> option.
>> 
>> The following patch disables this behaviour permanently but it should
>> probably be turned into an option in org-mode preserving the current
>> behaviour as the default.
>> 
>>      Modified lisp/org.el
>> diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
>> index 975266c..af57d54 100644
>> --- a/lisp/org.el
>> +++ b/lisp/org.el
>> @@ -19495,8 +19495,7 @@ beyond the end of the headline."
>>          (not (org-on-heading-p))
>>          arg)
>>      (call-interactively
>> -     (cond ((org-bound-and-true-p line-move-visual) 'end-of-visual-line)
>> -           ((fboundp 'move-end-of-line) 'move-end-of-line)
>> +     (cond ((fboundp 'move-end-of-line) 'move-end-of-line)
>>             (t 'end-of-line)))
>>        (let ((pos (point)))
>>      (beginning-of-line 1)
>> 
>
> Isn't this the same as setting line-move-visual to nil? Just pretend
> it's an org-mode option.

Could be :)  I didn't find any details about that var when I looked at
the docstrings for the functions involved.

Thanks for pointing that out.

-Bernt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]