Re: [O] References in Latex

[Aditya Mandayam]

i see. apologies.

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
here is my .org file in question:

The Shrewdness of Apes
#+AUTHOR: Aditya Zalewski-Mandayam
#+LaTeX_CLASS: handout
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil timestamp:nil num:f

* Introduction
The photographic act consists of three principal parts. They are varied.

** The Technique

** The Apparatus

** The Spectrum
   Here the term spectrum is as first used by Barthes\cite{barthes1994camera}.

   Photography is a brutal act. The vocabulary surrounding a
photograph is violent. There are shutters & filters & bellows;
aberrations & distortions; solarizers, polarizers, sensitizers;
developers, fixers, stoppers; these, in conjunction with those other
progeny of the industrial revolution, are used to shoot subjects, to
capture them.

A dark-room is simply that: a camera oscura. It is at once terrifying
& purposeful in its intent. Film & paper, once exposed to the tyranny
of that lies without, may not lie naked again until they have been
rehabilitated, until they have recovered to a state where they are
deemed meaningful\cite{tagg2009disciplinary}. This process of
selection is exquisite in its sadism; we now have machines that make
light of these macabre methods.

The earliest kind of photograph is the blink. A blink is a
preventative mechanism. One blinks to see better. One blinks to
lubricate. A blink is also a pause. It is when Man first noticed the
images formed on the inside of his eyelids, at once black & orange,
shape-shifting & electric, that the seeds of photography were sown.

The sneeze came next. Now we had a sound to emulate: the
shutter\cite{tagg1988burden}.

The Eye is King. The Mind is his Queen. They have no children.

We now live within that panoply of apparati the mechanical Eye has
birthed: chortles, sniffles, chuckles, giggles; cracks, queefs, farts,
wheezes; yawns\cite{barthes1978image}, moans, grimaces, frissons;
burps & belches, whispers & snores.

\bibliography{apes}
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
here are the relevant lines from my .emacs:

(require 'org-install)
(require 'org-latex)
(unless (boundp 'org-export-latex-classes)
(setq org-export-latex-classes nil))
(add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
             `("handout"

"\% rubber: set program xelatex
\\documentclass{tufte-handout}
\\usepackage{amsmath}
\\usepackage{graphicx}
\\usepackage{booktabs}
\\usepackage{units}
\\usepackage{multicol}
\\usepackage{fontspec,xltxtra,xunicode}
\\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
\\setromanfont[Mapping=tex-text]{Bauer Bodoni Std 1 Roman}
"

("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")

))

(defun org-mode-reftex-setup ()
(load-library "reftex")
(and (buffer-file-name)
(file-exists-p (buffer-file-name))
(reftex-parse-all))
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c c") 'reftex-citation)
)
(add-hook 'org-mode-hook 'org-mode-reftex-setup)

(setq org-latex-to-pdf-process
  '("rubber -sd %b")
)

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

thank you,

adi

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> [OT]
>
> Aditya
>
> ,----
> | I encourage you to post auxiliary files for reproducing the bug right
> | within the mail. The advantage is that the message would remain archived
> | in it's entirety forever and the whole context is available for future
> | references.
> |
> | Posting all the relevant files inline or as attachment has the following
> | other advantages:
> |
> | 1. less taxing on the owner of the bug
> | 2. quicker response or even a resolution
> |
> | ps: I don't mean to hijack this thread. Posting this as a
> | lurker/moderator on this list
> |
> `----
>
> Jambunathan K.
>
>