Re: [O] Schedule event

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hi Suvayu,

suvayu ali wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>>>>> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place
>>>>> these time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to
>>>>> implement.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great!  Maybe that clarifies
>>>> the bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones
>>>> are without any keyword.
>>>
>>> Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide
>>> how to put regular timestamps too.
>>
>> By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps? Can you, maybe,
>> comment on what makes the decision difficult?
>
> I meant active timestamps. I'll give you an example of a dilemma.
>
> * Timestamp in headline <2011-08-06 Sat>
>   For long headlines, this becomes really ugly.

I never used that form, in fact, because I don't like information to be placed
at different columns over the different headlines.

> * Timestamp below headline
>   <2011-08-06 Sat>
>
>   Problem with this is, I can't use fill paragraph otherwise it gets
>   wrapped with the timestamp. The solution is to have a blank line in
>   between.

Nor can't you do it with the first version, right?

And the problem will stay, even if we have events keyword'ed with APPT or
EVENT, do you agree?

I never use `M-q' on headlines, as I know they have to stay on one line,
whichever their length... A solution to this could be to make an Org-aware
version of `M-q' that would not try to refill Org headlines.

> As you see, my reasons are mostly about personal preference and
> aesthetics.

OK.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban