[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Schedule event
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Schedule event |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:14:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Jason,
Jason Dunsmore wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> writes:
>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>> Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide
>>> how to put regular timestamps too.
>>
>> By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps?
>
> I think he means active timestamps with no keyword. The Org FAQ and manual
> refer to active timestamps with no keyword as "plain timestamps".
>
>> Can you, maybe, comment on what makes the decision difficult?
>
> At least for me, in my early Org days, I wasn't sure of the best formatting
> convention for "plain timestamps". I settled on putting them on the line
> directly after the header with the proper indentation, since this is how
> SCHEDULED items were inserted.
OK. I thought the difficult decision was about the type of timestamps:
SCHEDULED, not SCHEDULED but active, or inactive.
Now, I understand he meant about the positioning of the timestamp itself.
Thanks for clarifying this.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] Schedule event, Jason Dunsmore, 2011/08/07