Re: [O] Bug: babel: results switch (output vs. value) has no or wrong effect for sh source block [7.7 (release_7.7.107.g7a82)]

[Achim Gratz]

Michael Brand <address@hidden> writes:
> If the shell is a special case for babel anyway, why not something
> like the following?

Ehm, no.  But I think that it would be generally useful (not just for
shell blocks) to be able to capture stderr, either together with stdout
or separately into a result target block and have the return status
available as a variable (although that does not work for consecutive
invocations in a session).


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds