emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords


From: Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
Subject: Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:39:33 -0300
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.0 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

Does org have TAB completion in "call lines" for names of blocks that can
be called?  Using "srcname" for blocks of code could make things easier but
if this is not the case then I "name" is just fine.

--
Darlan

At Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:37:13 +0100,
Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Daniel Bausch <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
> >> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
> >>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
> >
> > what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
> >
> > That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the 
> > additional 
> > line is for, is to "name" it.  That a source block contains source is also 
> > obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate 
> > the 
> > "src"-part?
> >
> > Daniel
> 
> I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but...
> 
> I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2].
> 
> I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and
> results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used
> for [3].  In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname...
> 
> -- 
> : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1
> : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]