Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

[Eric Schulte]

Martyn Jago <address@hidden> writes:

> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
>>> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
>>> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
>>> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
>>> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
>>> win.
>>> 
>>
>> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that easily.
>> I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the BDFL, the
>> NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the democratic rules
>> some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's with me?
>

Ha!

Well at least SCOTUS should be on my side, as they seem to have no
problem giving some people more freedom than others.

>
> +1 #+name
>

Well thank goodness, even if I can't put my own thumb on the scale it
seems I can advertise enough to sway voters to my cause. :)

Cheers -- Eric

>
> mj
>
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/