Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

[Daniel Bausch]

Am Mittwoch 26 Oktober 2011, 15:10:03 schrieb Giovanni Ridolfi:
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> > Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
> >> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
> >> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
> >> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
> >> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
> >> win.
> > 
> > This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that
> > easily. I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the
> > BDFL, the NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the
> > democratic rules some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's
> > with me?
> 
> +1 srcname
> 
> :-)
> 
> Power to the people! Democracy forever!
> 
> Giovanni /who has not used babel yet.

Hmm, then you don't know what we are talking about and should abstain from 
voting. ;-)
--
Daniel (who used Babel to write his thesis in one big file with all data and 
chart generating code interleaved with the text -- faboulous!)