[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bibliographic references
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bibliographic references |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:02 -0500 |
Alan L Tyree <address@hidden> wrote:
> I feel like this should be googleable, but I'm not having much luck.
>
> As Eric mentioned in a recent post, one of the nice things about
> writing in org is that there is no need to worry about output format.
>
He did say "mostly" I think...
> Except in one thing: How do I deal with bibliographic citations so that
> the output is sensible in the different formats? How do I get \cite
> {key} to export properly in XHTML and odt as well as in LaTeX?
>
... and I believe this is one area that is not covered by the "mostly"
umbrella :)
> Sorry if this is obvious to everybody else -- I'm stymied.
>
I don't know of an answer either. I'd like to find out that I'm wrong.
Nick
- [O] Bibliographic references, Alan L Tyree, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Nick Dokos, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Alan L Tyree, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Alan L Tyree, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/12/16
- Re: [O] Bibliographic references, Alan L Tyree, 2011/12/16