[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] Clock time implied as 00:00
From: |
François Pinard |
Subject: |
[O] Clock time implied as 00:00 |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:57:10 -0500 |
Hi, Org people.
This morning, I just noticed this line:
CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 9:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] => 11:44
because of the strange 11:44 total. My error is clear, as I wrote 9:30
instead of 09:30. Correcting it gives a move reasonable total:
CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 09:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] => 2:14
Yet, forgetting a leading 0 is an easy mistake (I know I should not make
mistakes!), and then, maybe (I'm not sure) Org mode could deliver
unexpected or misleading statistics out of a silent error. Not such a
problem for me, yet it could have become one if I missed it.
Would it be reasonable to suggest that Org mode be more lenient about
missing leading zeroes?
François
P.S. I wish every one is enjoying the Festive Times!
- [O] Clock time implied as 00:00,
François Pinard <=