[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY:
From: |
Thomas S. Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY: |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:39:33 -1000 |
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick and Eric,
>>
>> Nick Dokos wrote:
>> > Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Did you press C-c C-c on each property line after it was written?
>> >
>> > Just to clarify: do I really have to C-c C-c on each line? If I add a
>> > bunch of them and then do C-c C-c on one of them, shouldn't that be
>> > enough to refresh the setup?
>>
>> I got no reaction on my idea of "automagic C-c C-c" (on 2012-03-04 Sun, see
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg52739.html):
>>
>> The "automagic C-c C-c" should be NOT[1] done after each key press or
>> some
>> such. That certainly would be a killer feature, in its real acception:
>> performance would be unbearable.
>>
>> In my mind, automatically (re-)parsing the meta options should be each
>> time
>> the user presses `C-c C-v C-e' (eval code blocks); that is, when the user
>> expects his options to be taken into account.
>>
>> Does it make sense?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Seb
>>
>> Footnotes:
>>
>> [1] This word was missing (in the original post)!
>>
>
> Well, it might make sense but you can try it out and let us know:
>
> - make files with 10, 100, 1000 trivial (or even empty) code blocks,
> just enough to make sure that org-babel-execute-maybe is really called
> on them: I think that it will be called even on empty code blocks, but
> I'm not sure if there is some optimization in there.
>
> - measure the time it takes to export each one to html (say).
>
> - add a call to org-mode-restart into org-babel-execute-maybe, and time
> the same operation again: how significant is the slowdown?
>
> If the slowdown is bearable in these cases, then it will be bearable in
> realistic situations, where block execution is going to be a much more
> significant fraction of the total.
>
> BTW, what's the biggest file you (all, not just Seb) have in terms of the
> number of code blocks it contains? In my case, the largest one had about
> two dozen code blocks, so the 100 case would easily cover me, but I suspect
> there are much bigger ones out there.
Hi Nick,
118 source code blocks and growing.
Tom
>
> Nick
>
>
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com