[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY:
From: |
Rainer M Krug |
Subject: |
Re: [O] I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY: |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:21:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120309 Thunderbird/11.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 15/03/12 17:14, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick and Eric,
>>
>> Nick Dokos wrote:
>>> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Did you press C-c C-c on each property line after it was written?
>>>
>>> Just to clarify: do I really have to C-c C-c on each line? If I add a bunch
>>> of them and
>>> then do C-c C-c on one of them, shouldn't that be enough to refresh the
>>> setup?
>>
>> I got no reaction on my idea of "automagic C-c C-c" (on 2012-03-04 Sun, see
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg52739.html):
>>
>> The "automagic C-c C-c" should be NOT[1] done after each key press or some
>> such. That
>> certainly would be a killer feature, in its real acception: performance
>> would be unbearable.
>>
>> In my mind, automatically (re-)parsing the meta options should be each time
>> the user presses
>> `C-c C-v C-e' (eval code blocks); that is, when the user expects his options
>> to be taken into
>> account.
>>
>> Does it make sense?
>>
>> Best regards, Seb
>>
>> Footnotes:
>>
>> [1] This word was missing (in the original post)!
>>
>
> Well, it might make sense but you can try it out and let us know:
>
> - make files with 10, 100, 1000 trivial (or even empty) code blocks, just
> enough to make sure
> that org-babel-execute-maybe is really called on them: I think that it will
> be called even on
> empty code blocks, but I'm not sure if there is some optimization in there.
>
> - measure the time it takes to export each one to html (say).
>
> - add a call to org-mode-restart into org-babel-execute-maybe, and time the
> same operation
> again: how significant is the slowdown?
>
> If the slowdown is bearable in these cases, then it will be bearable in
> realistic situations,
> where block execution is going to be a much more significant fraction of the
> total.
>
> BTW, what's the biggest file you (all, not just Seb) have in terms of the
> number of code blocks
> it contains? In my case, the largest one had about two dozen code blocks, so
> the 100 case would
> easily cover me, but I suspect there are much bigger ones out there.
142 - used in literal programming.
Rainer
>
> Nick
>
- --
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology,
UCT), Dipl. Phys.
(Germany)
Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa
Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
email: address@hidden
Skype: RMkrug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk9m7JsACgkQoYgNqgF2egoV4ACeISeB8GZWSCDSkIPgqIHViqeh
fokAn3cgygfMKr2VInkLkHHX3gIPe58G
=S2uU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----