Re: [O] bulk rescheduling change?

[Greg Troxel]

Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:

> Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>> 
>> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four
>> > items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking
>> > them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next day, which
>> > apparently is taken as an indication that I want things to be
>> > rescheduled for that date, no questions asked. Not sure I like this
>> > much.
>> 
>> This implementation was to mimick the previous behavior we had with 
>> `k m' (to mark an entry) then `k s' (to schedule it to the date at 
>> point with no prompt.)
>> 
>> I don't like having no prompt here too.  
>> 
>> I just changed the behavior so that there is *always* a prompt 
>> with `m m m B s' -- if the cursor is on a date, this date is the
>> default time for the prompt, RET will reschedule to this date.
>> 
>
> Thanks - this sounds much better. I hope Greg likes it too.
> I ran a bunch of things past it and it worked perfectly (imo of course).

Yes, I have updated and the new behavior seems sensible and intuitive.
There's a default shown, but if I type anything it's ignored.  Thanks
for fixing this.

pgp8Cn2PwNaeo.pgp
Description: PGP signature