[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] insonsistency in source code at http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorial
From: |
Robert P. J. Day |
Subject: |
[O] insonsistency in source code at http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-beamer/tutorial.html |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:30:31 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
a bit more pedantry, but i'm currently collecting examples of
org/beamer processing to see how well i can reproduce them, and at
org's own example here:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-beamer/tutorial.html
if you follow the link in footnote 1, you see the alleged .org
source as containing:
... snip ...
#+LINK_UP:
#+LINK_HOME:
#+startup: oddeven
#+startup: beamer
#+LaTeX_CLASS: beamer
#+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [bigger]
#+latex_header: \mode<beamer>{\usetheme{Madrid}}
#+BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL: 2
#+COLUMNS: %20ITEM %13BEAMER_env(Env) %6BEAMER_envargs(Args)
%4BEAMER_col(Col) %7BEAMER_extra(Extra)
* Introduction
... snip ...
but if you click on the button "Show Org Source" at the very
bottom, you see:
... snip ...
#+LINK_UP:
#+LINK_HOME:
#+startup: oddeven
* Introduction
... snip ...
quite simply, the two sources are not the same, which might confuse
some folks (for me, the first example will be processed, while the
second won't be).
in any event, it would be useful if the source was displayed
consistently.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [O] insonsistency in source code at http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-beamer/tutorial.html,
Robert P. J. Day <=