Re: [O] ...

[Bastien]

Hi Carsten,

thanks a lot for the very clear explanations.

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

> The difference is only the repeated concatenation operation, and not the
> recompilation.  I always thought that this would work differently, and that
> is why a lot of regexps get constructed and then stored in variables or
> constants.  Of course this is also a good practice for readable and
> maintainable code, but the impact on efficiency is not as big as I used to
> think.  So when I saw Christoher's initial patch, I thought a function to
> create
> org-ooutline-regexp-bol would be a large burden in speed - but it now seems 
> that it would only be a minor impact.

That was my assumption too... hence my reaction to Christopher's
patch.

It now makes sense -- I'll ask for confirmation on the emacs-devel as
suggested by Christopher.

> Still, I think making a local variable in buffers with
> org-struct-mode is also a good way to get the functionality
> Christopher wants.

Mh... here I'm not sure to understand what you suggest. 
Isn't the whole point of Christopher's patch to rely on
a buffer local value of org-outline-regexp?  I surely miss
something.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien