Re: [O] Info: (org)Customizing tables in ODT export

[Jambunathan K]

Is this issue resolved for you.  

Firstly, make sure that org file is indeed of "right" size and is NOT
sheared to smaller size.

Secondly, think about "What has changed in my environment, which made me
notice this aberrant behaviour.  Did I change my PC, my desk etc etc".

Thirdly, try 
        emacs -Q

FWIW, here is a report from my x86/Debian.

,----
| address@hidden:~/src/org-mode/doc$ ls -al org*
|   915211 Feb  2 23:26 org
|    23759 Jan 13 23:48 orgcard.tex
|   398898 Feb  3 17:49 orgguide.pdf
|    99505 Jan 13 23:48 orgguide.texi
|  1408420 Feb  3 17:49 org.html
|  1729366 Feb  3 17:49 org.pdf
|   717545 Feb  2 23:23 org.texi
|      102 Feb  2 23:26 org-version.inc
`----

address@hidden (Thomas S. Dye) writes:

> Aloha Jambu,
>
> Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>
>> I am able to scroll/move up/down the info node without any issues.
>>
>> In the tiff file that you have attached, the section heading
>> corresponding to 12.8.11.4 is underlined with dots.  For me, there is no
>> such dotted underline in the node.
>>
>> Have you tried 
>>         emacs -Q
>>  
>> Either you are having extra customizations or using an enhanced version
>> of info (info+?) from Emacswiki or from elsewhere.
>
> This is the file created by 'make update' using the build system.  I
> don't believe I've customized anything here beyond making 'make update'
> the default synonym for 'make'.  I'll admit I'm not certain how or what
> the build system does to generate the documentation, but the files
> 'org', 'org.html', and 'org.pdf' were all created within a minute of one
> another. 
>
> I don't think I'm using info+.
>
> poto:dk dk$ info --version
> info (GNU texinfo) 4.13
>
> Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>
> I'm working on a Mac.
>
> Thanks again for looking into this.
>
> All the best,
> Tom

--