Re: [O] Confused about inline html images

[John Hendy]

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Still one issue: it's applying the attr_html to the wrong bit. Here's
>> the resultant export output:
>>
>> #+attr_html: width="400px"
>> [[http://path/to/file.jpg][http://path/to/file.jpg]]
>>
>> becomes:
>>
>> <a href="http://path/to/file.jpg"; width="400px"><img
>> src="http://path/to/file.jpg"; alt="file.jpg"/></a>
>
> Yes, that's wrong.  I fixed this.  Thanks for reporting it!
>

Sorry for the late response. I pulled when you made the change but
hadn't gotten around to testing. Still having odd behavior. The
minimal example:

M-x org-version
Org-mode version 7.9.3e (7.9.3e-910-g33c4f6 @
/home/jwhendy/.elisp/org.git/lisp/)

Emacs installed from Arch Linux main repository (not testing or from source):
$ emacs --version
GNU Emacs 24.2.1


#+begin_src minimal-config
;; set load paths
;; set load dirs and global config options
(add-to-list 'load-path "~/.elisp/org.git/contrib/lisp/")
(add-to-list 'load-path "~/.elisp/org.git/lisp/")
#+end_src

#+begin_src test.org
* A headline

And a random image from imgur:

- full size

[[http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg][http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg]]

- with an =attr_html= width passed:

#+attr_html: width="200px"
[[http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg][http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg]]
#+end_src

The process:
- emacs -q
- M-x load-file ~/path/to/minimal-config
- C-x C-f ~/path/to/test.org
- C-e h

When I open the file in a browser and view source, this is what I get
for the images portion:

#+begin_src html
<p>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg";
alt="http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg"; />
</p>
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>with an <code>attr_html</code> width passed:
</li>
</ul>


<p>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg"; width="200px"
alt="http://i.imgur.com/tladtBz.jpg"; />
</p>
#+end_src

It looks like it's using my second option for the alt text instead of
using it for a link? Not sure. This was happening to me when I
originally posted to the list about this (as in, I couldn't even get
the images to be clickable, but then magically it worked right after I
posted). Now it seems to be doing the original behavior.

Any suggestions?


John



> --
>  Bastien