[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Exporter interface question
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Exporter interface question |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:17:33 +0100 |
On 28.2.2013, at 22:10, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
>>>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
>>>
>>> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base
>>> buffer.
>>
>> I think it is necessary. If I move a marker to a position
>> in a buffer and another marker to the same position in a connected
>> indirect buffer, both markers are different and point to different
>> buffers. So if I start an export from an indirect buffer, the
>> dispatch marker will point to the indirect buffer. If I later
>> compare the marker-buffer with (org-base-buffer (current-buffer)) I
>> do get a mismatch. So if you want to compare to org-base-buffer,
>> I think I clearly need to set the marker to a position in the base
>> buffer.
>
> Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities?
That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be preferred to
what I am doing right now?
- Carsten
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question,
Carsten Dominik <=