[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:49:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi John,
John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks for the clarification, though regardless of the current
> state... what is the consensus on what it *should* be? The old lingo
> was:
> - #+attr_latex: width=Xcm
> - #+attr_html: width="Xpx"
... and the new lingo is
#+attr_latex: :width Xcm
#+attr_html: :width Xpx
for images. Images allow :width :height :alt attributes, while other
elements like links and tables allow only the :options attribute.
I updated ox-html.el so that it respects this syntax.
Nicolas, would it be okay to make
(org-export-read-attribute :attr_html element)
return "title=\"Title\"" instead of nil when the element's attributes
are like this
#+attr_html: title="Title"
?
Thanks,
--
Bastien
- [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Aaron Ecay, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Aaron Ecay, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter,
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, John Hendy, 2013/03/20
Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter, Bastien, 2013/03/19