[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:54:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:
> As I said, I don't even know why Gnus decides it should treat this mail as
> an Org file. From the sources of Gnus, it appears that it should only do
> this if the MIME type was text/x-org. Rainers mail didn't have this MIME
> type nor was it a multipart MIME mail that had such a part, yet Gnus
> triggered the buffer with "Org" as the major mode, which seems to indicate
> that the MIME type must somehow have been inferred. I can prevent that
> using orgstruct-mode instead, but as I proposed already there should be a
> "safe" variant of org-mode (a derived mode perhaps) that doesn't load any
> axtra files and doesn't run any source blocks. Of course, Gnus then should
> use this mode (it is only meant for proper fontification anyway, which I
> suppose must be possible without firing a whole major mode).
What about this patch?
The change in Gnus is then trivial (see other patch).
org-read-setup-file-conditionnally.patch
Description: Text Data
mm-view.el.patch
Description: Text Data
--
Bastien
- [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Rainer Stengele, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Andreas Leha, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?,
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, John Hendy, 2013/03/21