[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]
From: |
Viktor Rosenfeld |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4] |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2013 19:38:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
Rasmus wrote:
> Viktor Rosenfeld <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Ah, you mean the textsc? Perhaps it is a bit eccentric. But you're
> >> bringing up a good point. It should recognize [p]+s and perhaps even
> >> order them. . .
> >
> > If there is no PS prefix set, users could simply write these out
> > themselves. I don't think it is much of a burden. Recognizing multiple
> > :P[+]S: tags in code seems like overkill to me. The all go into the same
> > \ps, don't they?
>
> No, you'd want have
> \ps{ps:one}
> \ps{pps:two}
> \ps{pps:three}.
Okay, I didn't know this. But what's the advantage over
\ps{
ps:one
ps:two
ps:three}
> > The latter example does not really work for me because I often write
> > letters below a TODO headline (as opposed to a dedicated file). So I
> > restrict export to a subtree which would not work if I'm below the
> > letter headline. In my case I would use something like this:
> >
> > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
> > * TODO write letter
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :EXPORT_OPENING: ...
> > ...
> > :END:
> >
> > The letter goes here.
> >
> > ** TO :TO:
> > ...
> > #+END_EXAMPLE
> > I have a capture template setup for letters, so I don't normally have to
> > add the address information manually. I would probably stick to the old
> > format and use headlines if I have a PS and so on.
>
> Cool, you should write an article about!
Do you mean the capture template? I might put it in the tutorial. I
planned to have a tips and tricks section there anyway.
Cheers,
Viktor
>
> --
> Don't panic!!!
>
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: subject changes [2/4], (continued)
[O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4], Rasmus, 2013/05/19
Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Rasmus, 2013/05/19
- Message not available
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Rasmus, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Alan Schmitt, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Rasmus, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Viktor Rosenfeld, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Rasmus, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Viktor Rosenfeld, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Rasmus, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4], Viktor Rosenfeld, 2013/05/22
- [O] [PATCH] ox-koma-letter.el: Reintroduce variables removed in commit 832c6fd with proper defaults (was Re: [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: clean-up/semantic bug [4/4]), Viktor Rosenfeld, 2013/05/22