emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]


From: Viktor Rosenfeld
Subject: Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [3/4]
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:38:36 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi,

Rasmus wrote:

> Viktor Rosenfeld <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> Ah, you mean the textsc?  Perhaps it is a bit eccentric.  But you're
> >> bringing up a good point.  It should recognize [p]+s and perhaps even
> >> order them. . .
> >
> > If there is no PS prefix set, users could simply write these out
> > themselves. I don't think it is much of a burden. Recognizing multiple
> > :P[+]S: tags in code seems like overkill to me. The all go into the same
> > \ps, don't they?
> 
> No, you'd want have
> \ps{ps:one}
> \ps{pps:two}
> \ps{pps:three}.

Okay, I didn't know this. But what's the advantage over

\ps{
ps:one

ps:two

ps:three}
 
> > The latter example does not really work for me because I often write
> > letters below a TODO headline (as opposed to a dedicated file). So I
> > restrict export to a subtree which would not work if I'm below the
> > letter headline. In my case I would use something like this:
> >
> > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
> > * TODO write letter
> > :PROPERTIES:
> > :EXPORT_OPENING: ...
> > ...
> > :END:
> >
> > The letter goes here.
> >
> > ** TO :TO:
> > ...
> > #+END_EXAMPLE
> > I have a capture template setup for letters, so I don't normally have to
> > add the address information manually. I would probably stick to the old
> > format and use headlines if I have a PS and so on.
> 
> Cool, you should write an article about!

Do you mean the capture template? I might put it in the tutorial. I
planned to have a tips and tricks section there anyway.

Cheers,
Viktor

> 
> -- 
> Don't panic!!!
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]