[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template
From: |
Suvayu Ali |
Subject: |
Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:14:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) |
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:31:39AM +0200, Andreas Leha wrote:
>
> So I'd like to ask: Is there a possibility to get a really empty LaTeX
> export that reads everything (including the documentclass) from the
> #+LATEX_HEADER ?
>
> The reason for this is, that many journals/conferences come with their
> own LaTeX template (if I am lucky, that is). It would be very
> convenient, if I could just yank the provided header into my *.org
> file (and prefix with #+LATEX_HEADER).
I think you can just define a minimal class in org-latex-classes;
something like
\documentclass{article}
[NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
[NO-PACKAGES]
[EXTRA]
Then none of the packages listed in org-latex-default-packages-alist and
org-latex-packages-alist are included, and only the
#+LATEX_HEADER(_EXTRA) keywords are considered.
Hope this helps,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
- [O] empty LaTeX export template, Andreas Leha, 2013/06/11
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template,
Suvayu Ali <=
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template, Andreas Leha, 2013/06/11
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template, Eric S Fraga, 2013/06/13
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template, Rasmus, 2013/06/13
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template, Andreas Leha, 2013/06/13
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template, Rasmus, 2013/06/13
- Re: [O] empty LaTeX export template, Andreas Leha, 2013/06/13