Re: [O] [PATCH] Override the default class name with a new one.

[Rasmus]

Feng Shu <address@hidden> writes:

> #+LATEX_CLASS: article
> #+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart

I'm not sure this is the right approach. . .  I can certainly see the
value of generating classes on the fly, though.  But somehow the
proposed syntax just seems to counter-intuitive.  I'm not sure how to
overcome this, but perhaps it would be better to allow for an argument
to LATEX_CLASS, e.g.

(*)   #+LATEX_CLASS: myclass :class-name ctexart.

as e.g. the INCLUDE command.  Of course (*) is somewhat different from
how stuff like this is usually handled, cf. e.g. LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS.

–Rasmus

-- 
A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it