Re: [O] [PATCH] Add "latex" option to ox-bibtex.el

[Feng Shu]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
>
> feng shu <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I want to add a option which can setting bib for html export and latex
>> export separately,
>> As it for the reason:
>> 1. bibtex2html can't work well with complex bib style, so using a simple
>> style and making it
>>     show correctly is reasonable choose,
>> 2. bibtex2html can't find bib style in current dir, for example
>> (./file.sty) ,
>> 3. the biblatex user.
>
> I understand that. Though, you didn't tell me what was wrong with the
> hook I provided.
>
>> In my opinion, the solution seemd more hacky than mine for a user,  
>
> Of course. A hook (or a filter) is a hack. But at least, it doesn't live
> in core.
>
>> It let my org-mode file more unportable.
>
> Portability is not an issue here. If you're really worried about it, you
> need to share your configuration file along with your Org documents
> anyway. If you don't, your documents will never be totally portable.

You are right, totally protable is impossible.  My goal is that my
document can work correct in standard org-mode environment, But it seemd
impossible in real world.  emacs = toss

>
>> Could you share you opinion and reason about my approach:  Is the idea ,
>> separating with  a new option, hacky?  or my code hacky? .
>
> My opinion is that we cannot add options to handle every possible use
> case. That's why filters and hooks exist in the first place. Thus, when
> a feature can be implemented in a couple of lines with a hook/filter,
> I just ask to think twice before adding it to core.
>
> Now, speaking about the patch, you only provide an option to ignore
> "bibliography" keyword when exporting with latex back-end, but you still
> have to write correct bibliography command by hand in the Org buffer.

filter can be used in babel? for example:

#+begin_src emacs-lisp
...
#+end_src

>
> I think a cleaner solution would be to be able to choose both
> bibliography and style according to back-end from within the keyword
> itself. I very much like Babel's "by-backend" approach.
I like Babel's "by-backend" approach too, but it may be  beyond my elisp 
ability... :-(

Before this patch, I tested below code, failed!
I like this approach, but it may be impossible  to realize.

#+BEGIN_HTML
#+BIBLIO............
#+END_HTML


>
> That's more work for sure, but, meanwhile I think something like the
> hook I provided is good enough for the job at hand.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Regards,

--