Re: [O] Adding support for limits and exclusions to iCal recurring events

[David Rogers]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm clearly no Agenda specialist. I thought a DEADLINE would end
> a repeated event already. If it's not the case, does it make sense to
> implement it too?

I consider DEADLINE, in our context, to mean "when my finished work will
be needed", and therefore "when to start bothering me about getting it
done". I think that was the intention when this system was set up; in
other words, I think DEADLINE is treated as simply a personal warning
system, and it doesn't have the power to modify the agenda like TODO vs
DONE.

-- 
David R