Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?

[Carsten Dominik]

On Sep 5, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 3.9.2013, at 17:32, Matt Price <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> certain lines are not rendered by the org exporter, but are instead
>>> interpreted as instructions, e.g.:
>>> 
>>> #+AUTHOR: Matt Price
>>> 
>>> I'm using org2blog/wp, which is only partially converted to the new
>>> exporter.  It works pretty well, but not perfectly.  It has the neat
>>> feature that, when I insert a link to a local image, it will upload
>>> that image to wordpress and link to the uploaded file.  TO keep track
>>> of the location of those images, it writes lines like this to the org
>>> file:
>>> 
>>> #+/home/matt/Matt_headshots/Matt Price/IMG_9367_.jpg
>>> http://2013.hackinghistory.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/wpid-IMG_9367_2.jpg
>>> 
>>> Recently I've noticed that these lines are actually being rendered by
>>> the underlying html exporter before export.
>> 
>> I don't think this is the right behavior, such lines should not be rendered.
>> Suvayu is right, with a space after the # they are treated as commendt, but 
>> I think
>> they should also be ignored with the plus.
>> 
>> Nicolas, what is the reasoning behind rendering them?
> 
> Because this isn't valid Org syntax, so it is treated as regular text
> (i.e. a paragraph). Something similar happens for unbalanced blocks:
> 
>  * H
> 
>  #+begin_example
> 
>  * H2
> 
> In the example above, "#+begin_example" is treated as a paragraph.
> 
> In both cases, silently ignoring them could cause more trouble that it
> would solve.

So in a way this is a "syntax error" message. :)

OK, I get that point.  Is that behaviour documented?

Thanks

- Carsten