Re: [O] Org mode issue tracker

[Carsten Dominik]

Hi Sebastiaan,

I have added your issues.

(P.S. this sounds really funny and reminds me of Marvin from the
"Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" does solve "all of the
major mathematical, physical, chemical, biological, sociological,
philosophical, etymological,meteorological and psychological
problems of the Universe *except his own*, three times over,")

- Carsten

On 25.9.2013, at 11:04, Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:

> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On 25.9.2013, at 09:51, Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>>> we do not have an issue tracker for Org.  However, if you
>>>> have some time to help, the file with open issues that need
>>>> attention can be found here:
>>>> 
>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/530458/org-tracker.html
>>>> 
>>>> Note that I do not enter every issue into this file.  Normally I wait
>>>> and see if a report gets addressed on the mailing list, and only
>>>> if that does not happen, than I make a note in this file.  I think
>>>> this keeps it more manageable for me - an official online bug tracker
>>>> would probably quickly fill with many small things we can better
>>>> handle on the list.
>>>> 
>>>> If you feel that this is not going well enough and if I am missing
>>>> important reports in this way, let me know and we will find a better
>>>> solution.
>>>> 
>>>> Some of these bugs still need confirmation by a second party,
>>>> and patches are always welcome.  If possible, reply in
>>>> the original thread, while still mentioning the bug number
>>>> in the above link.
>>> 
>>> The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the
>>> `org' package is already known to them), if that's possible. Anyway, having 
>>> the
>>> bugs in an Org file seems natural too!
>>> 
>>> But shouldn't it, maybe, be in a Git project, so that other people can edit 
>>> it?
>>> 
>>> And choosing to have the `Assignee' (or `ASSIGNEE') property be the official
>>> Org way to delegate a task to someone would help?
>>> 
>>> Regarding the list itself, if I may, I would add 3 problems (identified by 
>>> the
>>> date and time it has been sent on the Org mailing list):
>> 
>> To make my life easier, cold you please provide gmane links?
> 
> DONE ;-)  See below.
> 
>>> 1. 20130315.1805: Background color reset for links and DONE headlines
>>> 
>>>  Allow to have more faces than just `org-headline-done' when `DONE'
>>>  (`org-fontify-done-headline').
>>> 
>>>  I looked at it, following Bastien's hints, but never could make it work.
> 
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68552
> 
>>> 2. 20130909.1657: Clocktable error with multiple source files from parent 
>>> dir
> 
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/76207
> 
>>> 3. 20130912.1455: `org-agenda-sorting-strategy' does not work in `tags-todo'
>>> 
>>>  The following agenda view is supposed to display the tasks by ascending
>>>  DEADLINE timestamp.
>>> 
>>>    (add-to-list 'org-agenda-custom-commands
>>>                 '("B" "Today"
>>>                   tags-todo "DEADLINE<=\"<today>\""
>>>                   ((org-agenda-overriding-header "Today")
>>>                    (org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(deadline-up)))) t)
>>> 
>>>  it sorts the list by category, instead!
> 
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/76347
> 
>>> OTOH, you can "delegate" the problem #24 to me.
>>> 
>>> - 20130911.1448: Colored tags generate an error when C-x C-w'ing the agenda
>>> 
>>> I'll try to debug and fix it myself. I'll come back if I don't succeed.
>> 
>> OK, will do that, thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
>  Seb
> 
> -- 
> Sebastien Vauban
> 
>

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail